I’d been eagerly awaiting the release of Night Watch since I missed it at this year’s Melbourne International Film Festival, and I’m sad to say that I’m a little disappointed. Don’t get me wrong, Night Watch is far, far better than the atrocious Underworld, a film with which it shares several themes, but on the whole Timus Bekmambetov’s first chapter of the trilogy fails to completely entertain.
One of the positive aspects of Night Watch is the fact that it doesn’t go out of its way to explain the supernatural world – the members of The Watch go about their business, casting spells, transmogrifying and zipping between dimensions, and the audience is simply swept along. Some of the action pieces are great, if a little hard to follow. The filmmakers have done a lot with a limited budget, and there are some highly inventive supernatural moments.
It is curious to note that in some ways the narrative seemed inverted: most of the action happens in the first act, and it sort of calms down towards the end. The film reminded me a little of the novels of Clive Barker and Peter Straub, not just for their horror element, but the fact that they begin with a bang and then disappoint by winding down slowly by the end. It felt almost as if the story would be better suited to a television or mini-series. I was on several occasions reminded of Lars von Trier’s ‘The Kingdom’, what with the almost casual references to Armageddon (the event, not the sh*tbox film of the same name). Maybe I will appreciate this film more once the next two have been made (Day Watch (Dnevnoy dozor) due 2006, Night Watch 3 (Nochnoy dozor 3) due 2007), but overall Night Watch was a disappointment.