I thought Cube was a fantastic film, and a supreme example of the effectiveness of using an enclosed space as the setting for a psychological thriller. Thus I was pretty excited at the prospect of seeing the director’s next film.
Secondly I think that Natali was kinda spoilt for choice. With a much bigger budget and the ability to move around more than a 5 cubic metre set, the director certainly had big plans concerning the scope of the film. It appears that the makers pushed too far, however – more money is never quite enough money. While the few effects shots in Cube (which I understand were done by the effects company pro bono) were supremely effective, Cypher seems to try just a little bit too hard. Sometimes it looks fantastic, but other times it looks plain silly (ie: the helicopter. Oh, and this big shiny metal thing that seemed to be a leftover from one of the Men In Black movies). I think somebody needed to tell the filmmakers when to stop.
All that being said, I did enjoy Cypher quite a lot, I just wasn’t left with any particular wish to see it a second time like I was with Cube.
Oh, and can somebody please explain why it’s called Cypher?